The author: Professor Yasser Metwally
http://yassermetwally.com
INTRODUCTION
September 28, 2009 — Lymphomatous leptomeningitis (LLM) due to primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is an uncommon problem in neurooncology and can occur at time of diagnosis or recurrence. Notwithstanding frequent focal signs and symptoms, Lymphomatous leptomeningitis is a disease affecting the entire neuraxis, and therefore staging and treatment need to encompass all cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartments. Central nervous system staging of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis includes contrast agent–enhanced cranial computed tomography (CT) or Gd-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, Gd-enhanced spinal MR imaging, CT myelography, and radionuclide CSF flow study. Treatment of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis includes involved-field radiotherapy of bulky or symptomatic disease sites and intra-CSF drug therapy. The inclusion of concomitant systemic therapy can benefit patients with LM and can obviate the need for intra-CSF chemotherapy. At present, intra-CSF drug therapy is confined to three chemotherapeutic agents (methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, and thiotepa) administered by a variety of schedules either by intralumbar or intraventricular drug delivery. Although treatment of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis is palliative and the expected median survival of patients is 4 to 6 months, it often provides stabilization and protection from further neurological deterioration. In patients with primary CNS lymphoma, CNS prophylaxis has been recommended (using a combination of high-dose systemic chemotherapy and intra-CSF chemotherapy), but the strategy remains controversial because high-dose systemic methotrexate is commonly used as an adjuvant therapy. Patients with primary CNS lymphoma at high risk as defined by positive CSF cytology or neuroradiography consistent with LM may benefit from the inclusion of intra-CSF chemotherapy.
Primary CNS lymphomas are uncommon primary brain tumors that represent 1 to 2% of all brain tumors.[1,4-6,27-30,32,42,44,52-55,61,70] Primary CNS lymphomas occur in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients, especially in those who have undergone organ transplantation and in those with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.[5,70] The clinical presentation of patients with primary CNS lymphomas is a reflection of tumor topography within the CNS and most commonly one of several cerebral syndromes such as raised intracranial pressure, evolving stroke, or encephalopathy.[1,4-6,27-30,32,42,44,52-55,61,70] In approximately one third of patients, however, an atypical presentation occurs, including that of LM.[44,55] Primary CNS lymphoma recurs in the majority of patients, and in 40% of patients when restaging is undertaken following recurrence, LM is shown to be present.[3,16,48]
Because the definition of LM and the methods of assessment differ from study to study, defining its incidence in newly diagnosed patients with primary CNS lymphoma is problematic. The authors of the majority of studies have defined Lymphomatous leptomeningitis by a positive CSF cytopathology, which is the traditional method of assessment. The authors of other studies, however, have reported incidences based on CSF flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction, neuroimaging, or autopsy results as alternative methods of assessment. Another issue that likely affects the variability in incidence encountered between studies is the timing of surgery, volume of the lesion, site of sampling (ventricular or lumbar region), and frequency of CSF assessment. Cerebrospinal fluid sampling and yield of CSF cytology may, in addition, be affected by treatment, and the authors of most studies have not elaborated on how or when CSF sampling is performed.
In studies in which investigators define LLM as a positive CSF cytopathological finding, the results are similar.[3,29] Balmaceda and colleagues[3] each reported a prevalence of 27%, whereas other investigators, including Ferreri and colleagues[29] who reported on a larger series of patients, noted a prevalence of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis of 12 to 16%. When other methods of assessment, such as biopsy sampling and MR imaging, are integrated with CSF cytopathological examination, the reported prevalence increases, and in one study of patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphomas it was 42%. The authors of other studies using different modalities, including polymerase chain reaction for a component of immunoglobulin G heavy chain or contrast agent-enhanced brain and spinal imaging alone, have reported lower prevalence values for Lymphomatous leptomeningitis : 13 and 12.5%, respectively.[41,47] Thus, on the basis of published reports the frequency of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis ranges from 12.5 to 42% in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphomas. Isolated leptomeningeal relapse is uncommon in patients with primary CNS lymphomas; however, simultaneous disease in the brain and leptomeninges has been reported in up to 40% of patients with primary CNS lymphoma at the time of relapse.[3,5,53]
In summary, LLM is sufficiently common that leptomeningeal-directed therapy is indicated as part of the treatment regimen in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphomas. Leptomeningeal-directed therapy takes several forms: intra-CSF chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or high-dose systemic chemotherapy that in addition treats the leptomeningeal compartment (for example, high-dose intravenous methotrexate).[36]
Lymphomatous meningitis classically presents with pleomorphic clinical manifestations encompassing symptoms and signs in the following three domains of neurological function: 1) the cerebral hemispheres; 2) the cranial nerves; and 3) the spinal cord and roots. Signs on examination generally exceed the symptoms reported by the patient.[2,11,36,69,71]
The most common manifestations of cerebral hemisphere dysfunction are headache and mental status changes. Other signs include confusion, dementia, seizures, and hemiparesis. These findings often overlap with signs of parenchymal primary CNS lymphomas and therefore the clinical distinction between parenchymal and CSF compartment disease can be challenging. Diplopia is the most common symptom of cranial nerve dysfunction, with the sixth cranial nerve being the most frequently affected, followed by the third and fourth cranial nerves. Trigeminal sensory or motor loss, cochlear dysfunction, and optic neuropathy are also common findings. Spinal signs and symptoms include weakness (lower extremities more often than upper), dermatomal or segmental sensory loss, and pain in the neck, back, or following radicular patterns. Nuchal rigidity is only present in 15% of cases.[2,11,36,69,71]
A high index of suspicion is required to make the diagnosis of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis . The finding of multifocal neuraxis disease in a patient with primary CNS lymphoma is strongly suggestive of LM, but it is also common for patients with Lymphomatous leptomeningitis to present with isolated syndromes such as symptoms of raised intracranial pressure, cauda equina syndrome, or cranial neuropathy.
New neurological signs and symptoms may represent progression of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis but must be distinguished from the manifestations of parenchymal disease, from side effects of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and, rarely, from paraneoplastic syndromes.
- Diagnosis of LM
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Examination
The most useful laboratory test for diagnosing Lymphomatous leptomeningitis is investigation of the CSF. Abnormalities include increased opening pressure (> 26 mm H2O), increased leukocytes (> 4/mm3), elevated protein (> 50 mg/dl), or decreased glucose (< 60 mg/dl), parameters that, although suggestive of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis , are not diagnostic. The presence of malignant cells in the CSF is diagnostic of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis .
Magnetic resonance imaging with Gd enhancement is the modality of choice to evaluate patients with suspected leptomeningeal metastasis.[23,59,66] Because Lymphomatous leptomeningitis involves the entire neuraxis, whole-CNS imaging is required in patients considered for further treatment. Both contrast agent-enhanced and unenhanced T1-weighted sequences, combined with fat suppression T2-weighted sequences, constitute the standard MR imaging examination. Magnetic resonance imaging has been shown to have a higher sensitivity than cranial contrast medium-enhanced CT scanning in several series and is similar to CT myelography for the evaluation of the spine, but is significantly better tolerated.[12,31,58]
Any irritation of the leptomeninges will result in their enhancement on MR imaging, which is seen as a fine signal intense layer that follows the gyri and superficial sulci. Subependymal involvement of the ventricles often results in enhancement of the ventricles. Some changes such as cranial nerve enhancement and intradural extramedullary enhancing nodules (most frequently seen in the cauda equina) can be considered diagnostic of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis in patients with cancer. Because lumbar puncture itself rarely causes a meningeal reaction leading to dural-arachnoidal enhancement, imaging should be conducted preferably prior to the procedure.[50] The incidence of false-negative results on Gd-enhanced MR imaging remains 30% so that a normal study does not exclude the diagnosis of an LM. In cases involving a typical clinical presentation, however, abnormal results on Gd-enhanced MR imaging alone are adequate to establish the diagnosis of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis .
- Management of lymphomatous leptomeningitis
The treatment of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis is complicated by the lack of standard therapy, the difficulty of determining response to treatment because of the suboptimal sensitivity of the diagnostic procedures, the fact that most patients die of progressive parenchymal disease, and the fact that most studies of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis are small, nonrandomized, and retrospective. However, it is clear that treatment of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis can provide effective palliation and in some cases result in prolonged survival. Treatment in most cases requires the combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy.
Surgery is used in the treatment of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis for the placement of 1) intraventricular catheters and subgaleal reservoirs for administration of cytotoxic drugs and 2) ventriculoperitoneal shunts in patients with symptomatic hydrocephalus.
Drugs can be instilled into the subarachnoid space by lumbar puncture or via an intraventricular reservoir system. The latter is the preferred approach because it is simpler, more comfortable for the patient, and safer than repeated lumbar punctures. It also results in a more uniform distribution of the drug in the CSF space and produces the most consistent CSF levels. In up to 10% of lumbar punctures the drug is delivered to the epidural space, even if there is CSF return after placement of the needle, and the distribution of the drug has been shown to be better after reservoir-based drug delivery.
Lymphomatous meningitis often causes communicating hydrocephalus leading to symptoms of raised intracranial pressure. Relief of sites of CSF flow obstruction with involved-field radiation should be attempted to avoid the need for placing a CSF shunt. If hydrocephalus persists, a ventriculoperitoneal shunt should be placed to relieve the pressure because relief of pressure often results in clinical improvement. If possible, an in-line on/off valve and reservoir should be used to permit the administration of intra-CSF chemotherapy, although some patients cannot tolerate having the shunt turned off to allow the circulation of the drug.
Finally, in patients with a persistent blockage of ventricular CSF flow, a lumbar catheter and reservoir can be used in addition to a ventricular catheter, to allow treatment of the spine with intra-CSF chemotherapy (although as discussed earlier, cases involving post-irradiation persistent CSF flow blocks are probably best managed using supportive care alone).
Radiotherapy is used in the treatment of Lymphomatous leptomeningitis for several reasons: 1) palliation of symptoms, such as a cauda equina syndrome, 2) to decrease space-occupying disease such as large-volume subarachnoid metastases, and 3) to correct CSF flow abnormalities demonstrated by radionuclide ventriculography. Patients may exhibit significant symptoms despite the absence of imaging evidence of space-occupying disease and still benefit from radiotherapy. For example, patients with low-back pain and leg weakness should be considered for radiotherapy of the cauda equina, and those with cranial neuropathies should be offered whole-brain or base skull radiotherapy.
Radiotherapy of large-volume disease is indicated because intra-CSF chemotherapy is limited by diffusion to 2 to 3 mm penetration into tumor nodules. In addition, involved-field irradiation can correct CSF flow abnormalities, and this has been shown to improve patient outcome. Whole-neuraxis radiotherapy is rarely indicated in the treatment of LM from solid tumors because it is associated with significant systemic toxicity (severe myelosuppression and mucositis, among other complications) and is not curative.
Chemotherapy is the only modality that can treat the entire neuraxis and can be administered systemically or intrathecally.[11,36,60,63,70] The most effective drug used in patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma is high-dose methotrexate.[1,4-6,27-30,32,42,44,52-54,55,61,70] When this drug is administered in gram quantities (high dose), cytotoxic CSF levels are achieved. Following a single dose of intravenous methotrexate at 8 g/m2, CSF methotrexate levels greater than 1.0 μM are obtained and sustained for 24 to 48 hours.[36]
The treatment of concomitant LM in the setting of recurrent parenchymal primary CNS lymphomas is challenging. Most systemic chemotherapy treats LM inadequately due to the insufficient CSF drug levels as seen in cases in which temozolomide, PCV (procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine), rituximab, or topotecan are used. Exceptions are seen when using high-dose methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, or thiotepa—chemotherapy agents with demonstrated activity against leptomeningeal metastases. Alternatively, intraventricular chemotherapy can be used, which, although limited to three agents (methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, and thiotepa), has demonstrated activity and palliative benefit in patients with LM.[16,26,71] However, intra-CSF chemotherapy is primarily effective against small tumor burden and disease involving the CSF and 1 to 2 mm of the leptomeningeal surface.[16,26,71] Larger subarachnoid or parenchymal tumors are ineffectively treated by intra-CSF chemotherapy and, if present, require concomitant systemic chemotherapy or involved-field radiotherapy.[16,17,26,71]
Complications of intra-CSF chemotherapy include those related to the ventricular reservoir and those related to the chemotherapy agent(s) administered.[19,64] The most frequent complications of ventricular reservoir placement are malposition (range of reported rates 3-12%), obstruction, and infection (usually skin flora). Cerebrospinal fluid infection occurs in 2 to 13% of patients undergoing intra-CSF chemotherapy. Patients with CSF infection commonly present with headache, changes in neurological status, fever, and malfunction of the reservoir. Cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis is commonly encountered. The most frequently isolated organism is Staphylococcus epidermidis. Treatment requires intravenous administration of antibiotics with or without oral and intraventricular agents. Some authors have advocated the routine removal of the ventricular reservoir, whereas others believe that removal of the device should be reserved for cases in which antibiotic therapy does not resolve the infection. Routine culturing of CSF samples is not recommended because of the high rate of contamination with skin flora in the absence of infection. Myelosuppression can occur after administration of intra-CSF chemotherapy agents, and it is recommended that folinic acid rescue (10 mg every 6 hours for 24 hours) be given orally after the administration of methotrexate to avoid this complication. Chemical aseptic meningitis occurs in nearly 50% of patients treated by intra-CSF administration, and its symptoms manifest as fever, headache, nausea, vomiting, meningismus, and photophobia. In most patients, this inflammatory reaction can be treated in the outpatient setting with oral antipyretic, antiemetic, and corticosteroid agents. Rarely, treatment-related neurotoxicity occurs and can result in a symptomatic subacute leukoencephalopathy or myelopathy. In patients with LM and prolonged survival, however, the combination of radio- and chemotherapy frequently results in a late-onset leukoencephalopathy evident on imaging studies and occasionally causing symptoms.[34,38,39,43,46,62]
The rationale for giving intra-CSF chemotherapy is based on the presumption that most chemotherapeutic agents, when administered systemically, have poor CSF penetration and do not reach therapeutic levels. Exceptions to this would be systemic high-dose methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa, all of which result in cytotoxic CSF levels. Their systemic administration is limited, however, by systemic toxicity and by the difficulty of integrating these regimens into other chemotherapeutic programs being used to manage a patient’s systemic disease. Additionally, in patients with recurrent primary CNS lymphomas and previous treatment with high-dose methotrexate, alternative systemic therapies are used without compelling evidence of CSF penetration or the ability to eradicate the CSF compartment. Some authors have argued that intra-CSF chemotherapy does not add to improved outcome in the treatment of LM, because systemic therapy can reach the subarachnoid deposits through tumor vascular supply.[62]
Nonetheless, intrathecal chemotherapy remains the preferred treatment route for LM at this time. New intra-CSF drugs are being explored to try to improve efficacy, including mafosphamide, diaziquone, topotecan, interferon-α, etoposide, rituximab, and temozolomide. Gene therapy and immunotherapy using interleukin-2 and interferon-α, 131I-radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies are other modalities being explored in clinical trials.
References
-
Abrey LE, Yahalom J, DeAngelis LM: Treatment for primary CNS lymphoma: the next step. J Clin Oncol 18: 3144-3150, 2000
-
Balm M, Hammack J: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Presenting features and prognostic factors. Arch Neurol 53: 626-632, 1996
-
Balmaceda C, Gaynor JJ, Sun M, Gluck JT, DeAngelis LM: Leptomeningeal tumor in primary central nervous system lymphoma: recognition, significance, and implications. Ann Neurol 38: 202-209, 1995
-
Bataille B, Delwail V, Menet E, Vendermarq P, Ingrand P, Wagner M, et al: Primary intracerebral malignant lymphoma: report of 248 cases. J Neurosurg 92: 261-266, 2000
-
Batchelor T, Loeffler JS: Primary CNS lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 24: 1281-1288, 2006
-
Batchelor TT, Carson K, O’Neill A, Grossman SA, Alavi J, New P, et al: The treatment of primary CNS lymphoma with methotrexate and deferred radiotherapy: a report of NABTT 96-07. J Clin Oncol 21: 1044-1049, 2003
-
Berweiler U, Krone A, Tonn JC: Reservoir systems for intraventricular chemotherapy. J Neurooncol 38: 141-143, 1998
-
Biesterfeld S, Bernhard B, Bamborschke S, Blocking A: DNA single cell cytometry in lymphocytic pleocytosis of the cerebrospinal fluid. Acta Neuropathol 86: 428-432, 1993
-
Blaney SM, Poplack DG: New cytotoxic drugs for intrathecal administration. J Neurooncol 38: 219-223, 1998
-
10.A0Boogerd W, Vroom TM, van Heerde P, Brutel de la Riviere, Peterse J, van der Sande JJ: CSF cytology versus immunocytochemistry in meningeal carcinomatosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51: 142-145, 1988
-
Chamberlain MC: Carcinomatous meningitis. Arch Neurol 54: 16-17, 1997
-
Chamberlain MC: Comparative spine imaging in leptomeningeal metastases. J Neurooncol 23: 233-238, 1995
-
Chamberlain MC: Cytologically negative carcinomatous meningitis: usefulness of CSF biochemical markers. Neurology 50: 1173-1175, 1998
-
Chamberlain MC: Radioisotope CSF flow studies in leptomeningeal metastases. J Neurooncol 38: 135-140, 1998
-
Chamberlain MC, Corey-Bloom J: Leptomeningeal metastases: 111Indium-DTPA CSF flow studies. Neurology 41: 1765-1769, 1991
-
Chamberlain MC, Dirr L: Involved-field radiotherapy and intra-Ommaya methotrexate/cytarabine in patients with AIDS-related lymphomatous meningitis. J Clin Oncol 11: 1978-1984, 1993
-
Chamberlain MC, Kormanik PA: Prognostic significance of coexistent bulky metastatic central nervous system disease in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Arch Neurol 54: 1364-1368, 1997
-
Chamberlain MC, Kormanik PA: Prognostic significance of 111Indium-DTPA CSF flow studies in leptomeningeal metastases. Neurology 46: 1674-1677, 1996
-
Chamberlain MC, Kormanik PA, Barba D: Complications associated with intraventricular chemotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. J Neurosurg 87: 694-699, 1997
-
Chamberlain MC, Kormanik P, Glantz M: Recurrent primary central nervous system lymphoma complicated by lymphomatous meningitis. Oncol Rep 5: 521-525, 1998
-
Chamberlain MC, Kormanik PA, Glantz MJ: A comparison between ventricular and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid cytology in adult patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Neuro-oncol 3: 42-45, 2001
-
Chamberlain MC, Kormanik P, Jaeckle KA, Glantz M: 111Indium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid CSF flow studies predict distribution of intrathecally administered chemotherapy and outcome in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Neurology 52: 216-217, 1999
-
Chamberlain MC, Sandy AD, Press GA: Leptomeningeal metastasis: a comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR and contrast-enhanced CT of the brain. Neurology 40: 435-438, 1990
-
Cheng TM, O’Neill BP, Scheithauer BW, Piepgras DG: Chronic meningitis: the role of meningeal or cortical biopsy. Neurosurgery 34: 590-596, 1994
-
Cibas ES, Malkin MG, Posner JB, Relamed M: Detection of DNA abnormalities by flow cytometry in cells from cerebro spinal fluid. Am J Clin Pathol 88: 570-577, 1987
-
DeAngelis LM: Current diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis. J Neurooncol 38: 245-252, 1998
-
DeAngelis LM, Seiferheld W, Schold SC, Fisher B, Schultz CJ: Combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 93-100. J Clin Oncol 20: 4643-4648, 2002
-
DeAngelis LM, Yahalom J, Thaler HT, Kher U: Combined modality therapy for primary CNS lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 10: 635-643, 1992
-
Ferreri, AJM, Reni M, Pasini F, Calderoni A, Tirelli U, Pivnik A, et al: A multicenter study of treatment of primary CNS lymphoma. Neurology 59: 1513-1520, 2002
-
Freilich RJ, Delattre JY, Monjour A, DeAngelis LM: Chemo therapy without radiation therapy as initial treatment for primary CNS lymphoma in older patients. Neurology 46: 435-439, 1996
-
Freilich RJ, Krol G, DeAngelis LM: Neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid cytology in the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis. Ann Neurol 38: 51-57, 1995
-
Fisher BJ, Seiferheld W, Schultz C, DeAngelis L, Nelson D, Schold SC, et al: Secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study (RTOG) 9310: an intergroup Phase II combined modality treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma. J Neurooncol 74: 201-205, 2005
-
Garson JA, Coakham HB, Kemshead JT, Brownell B, Harper EI, Allan P, et al: The role of monoclonal antibodies in brain tumor diagnosis and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. J Neurooncol 3: 165-171, 1985
-
Giannone L, Greco FA, Hainsworth JD: Combination intraventricular chemotherapy for meningeal neoplasia. J Clin Oncol 4: 68-73, 1986
-
Glantz MJ, Cole BF, Glantz LK Cobb J, Mills P, Lekos A, et al: Cerebrospinal fluid cytology in patients with cancer. Minimizing false-negative results. Cancer 82: 733-739, 1998
-
Glantz MJ, Cole BF, Rechtl, Akerley W, Mills P, Sarvis S: High-dose intravenous methotrexate for patients with nonleukemic leptomeningeal cancer: is intrathecal chemotherapy necessary? J Clin Oncol 16: 1561-1567, 1998
-
Glantz MJ, Hall WA, Cole BF, Chozick B, Shannon CM, Wahlberg L, et al: Diagnosis, management, and survival of patients with leptomeningeal cancer based on cerebrospinal fluid-flow status. Cancer 75: 2919-2931, 1995
-
Glantz MJ, Jaeckle KA, Chamberlain MC, Phuphanich S, Recht L, Swinnen LJ, et al: A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal sustained-release cytarabine (DepoCyt) to intrathecal methotrexate in patients with neoplastic meningitis from solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 5: 3394-3402, 1999
-
Glantz MJ, LaFollette S, Jaeckle KA, Shapiro W, Swinnen L, Rozental JR, et al: Randomized trial of a slow release versus a standard formulation of cytarabine for the intrathecal treatment of lymphomatous meningitis. J Clin Oncol 17: 3110-3116, 1999
-
Glass JP, Melamed M, Chernik NL Prossner JB: Malignant cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): the meaning of a positive CSF cytology. Neurology 29: 1369-1375, 1979
-
Gleissner B, Siehl J, Korfel A, Reinhardt R, Thiel E: CSF evaluation in primary central nervous system lymphoma patients by PCR of the CDR III IgH genes. Neurology 58: 390-396, 2002
-
Herrlinger U, Schabet M, Brugger W, Kortmann RD, Kuker W, Deckert M, et al: German Cancer Society Neuro-Oncology Working Group NOA-03 multicenter trial of single-agent high-dose methotrexate for primary central nervous system lymphoma. Ann Neurol 51: 247-252, 2002
-
Hitchins RN, Bell DR, Woods RL, Levi JA: A prospective randomized trial of single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in meningeal carcinomatosis. J Clin Oncol 5: 1655-1662, 1987
-
Hoang-Xuan K, Tallandier L, Chinot O, Soubeyran P, Bogdhan U, Hildebrand JJ, et al: Chemotherapy alone as initial treatment for primary CNS lymphoma in patients older than 60 years: a multicenter phase II study (26952) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor Group. J Clin Oncol 21: 2726-2731, 2003
-
Hovestadt A, Henzen-Logmans SC, Vecht CJ: Immunohis to chemical analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid for carcinomatous and lymphomatous leptomeningitis. Br J Cancer 62: 653-654, 1990
-
Jaeckle KA, Batchelor T, O’Day SJ, Phuphanich S, New P, Lesser G, et al: An open trial of sustained-release cytarabine (Depocyt) for the intrathecal treatment of solid tumor neoplastic meningitis. J Neurooncol 57: 231-239, 2002
-
Kros JM, Bagdi EK, Zheng P, Hop WC, Driesse MJ, Krenacs L, et al: Analysis of immunoglobulin H gene rearrangement by polymerase chain reaction in primary central nervous system lymphoma. J Neurosurg 97: 1390-1396, 2002
-
Lachance DH, O’Neill BP, Macdonald DR, Jaeckle KA, Witzig TE, Li CY: Primary leptomeningeal lymphoma: report of 9 cases, diagnosis with immunocytochemical analysis, and review of the literature. Neurology 41: 95-100, 1991
-
Mason WP, Yeh SD, DeAngelis LM: 111Indium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid cerebrospinal fluid flow studies predict distribution of intrathecally administered chemotherapy and out come in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Neurology 50: 438-444, 1998
-
Mittl RL Jr, Yousem DM: Frequency of unexplained meningeal enhancement in the brain after lumbar puncture. Am J Neuroradiol 15: 633-638, 1994
-
Murray JJ, Greco FA, Wolff SN Hainsworth JD: Neoplastic men ingitis. Marked variations of cerebrospinal fluid composition in the absence of extradural block. Am J Med 75: 289-294, 1983
-
Neuwelt EA, Goldman DL, Dahlborg SA, Crossen J, Ramsey F, Roman-Goldstein S, et al: Primary CNS lymphoma treated with osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption: Prolonged survival and preservation of cognitive function. J Clin Oncol 9: 1580-1590, 1991
-
Pels H, Schmidt-Wolf IGH, Glasmacher A, Schulz H, Engert A, Diehl V, et al: Primary central nervous system lymphoma: results of a pilot and phase II study of systemic and intra ventricular chemotherapy with deferred radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 21: 4489-4495, 2003
-
Plotkin SR, Betensky RA, Hochberg FH, Grossman SA, Lesser GJ, Nabors LB, et al: Treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma with sequential courses of high-dose methotrexate. Clin Cancer Res 10: 5643-5646, 2004
-
Poortmans PMP, Kluin-Nelemans HC, Haaxma-Reiche H, Van’t Veer M, Hansen M, Soubeyran P, et al: High-dose methotrexate based chemotherapy followed by consolidating radiotherapy in non-AIDS-related primary central nervous system lymphoma: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lymphoma Group phase II trial 20962. J Clin Oncol 21: 4483-4488, 2003
-
Rhodes CH, Glantz MJ, Glantz L, Lekos A, Sorenson GD, Hon siger C, et al: A comparison of polymerase chain reaction examination of cerebrospinal fluid and conventional cytology in the diagnosis of lymphomatous meningitis. Cancer 77: 543-548, 1996
-
Sandberg DI, Bilsky MH, Souweidane MM, Bzdil J, Gutlin P: Ommaya reservoirs for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastases. Neurosurgery 47: 49-55, 2000
-
Schuknecht B, Huber P, Buller B, Nadjmi M: Spinal leptomeningeal neoplastic disease. Evaluation by MR, myelography and CT myelography. Eur Neurol 32: 11-16, 1992
-
Schumacher M, Orszagh M: Imaging techniques in neoplastic meningiosis. J Neurooncol 38: 111-120, 1998
-
Shapiro WR, Young DF, Mehta BM: Methotrexate distribution in cerebrospinal fluid after intravenous, ventricular and lumbar injections. N Engl J Med 293: 161-166, 1975
-
Shibamoto Y, Ogino H, Hasegawa M, Suzuki K, Nishio M, Fujii T, et al: Results of radiation monotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma in the 1990s. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62: 809-813, 2005
-
Siegal T: Leptomeningeal metastases: rationale for systemic chemotherapy or what is the role of intra-CSF-chemotherapy? J Neurooncol 38: 151-157, 1998
-
Siegal T, Lossos A, Pfeffer MR: Leptomeningeal metastases: analysis of 31 patients with sustained off-therapy response following combined-modality therapy. Neurology 44: 1463-1469, 1994
-
Siegal T, Pfeffer MR, Steiner I: Antibiotic therapy for infected Ommaya reservoir systems. Neurosurgery 22: 97-100, 1988
-
Stockhammer G, Poewe W, Burgstaller S, Deisenhammer F, Muigg A, Kiechl S, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor in CSF: a biological marker for carcinomatous meningitis. Neurology 54: 1670-1676, 2000
-
Sze G, Soletsky S, Bronen R, Krol G: MR imaging of the cranial meninges with emphasis on contrast enhancement and meningeal carcinomatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 53: 1039-1049, 1989
-
van Oostenbrugge RJ, Hopman AH, Arends JW, Hopman A, Arends J, Raemaekers F, et al: The value of interphase cytogenetics in cytology for the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases. Neurology 51: 906-908, 1998
-
van Oostenbrugge RJ, Hopman AHN, Ramaekers FCS, Twijnstra A: In situ hybridization: a possible diagnostic aid in leptomeningeal metastasis. J Neurooncol 38: 127-133, 1998
-
Van Oostenbrugge RJ, Twijnstra A: Presenting features and value of diagnostic procedures in leptomeningeal metastases. Neurology 53: 382-385, 1999
-
Velasquez WS: Primary central nervous system lymphoma. J Neurooncol 20: 177-185, 1994
-
Wasserstrom WR, Glass JP, Posner JB: Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: experience with 90 patients. Cancer 49: 759-772, 1982
-
- Metwally, MYM: Textbook of neuroimaging, A CD-ROM publication, (Metwally, MYM editor) WEB-CD agency for electronic publication, version 10.3a July 2009 [Click to have a look at the home page]